How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Terrifies' Creatives

For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a good friend - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few basic triggers about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and extremely funny in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of composing, but it's also a bit repeated, and really verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, because pivoting from compiling AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can purchase any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anyone's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, created by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He hopes to widen his range, creating different genres such as sci-fi, and opensourcebridge.science possibly providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - selling AI-generated items to human consumers.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, wikitravel.org artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we really mean human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think the use of generative AI for imaginative purposes must be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without approval must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very powerful but let's construct it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize creators' material on the internet to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of delight," says the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for users.atw.hu Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its finest performing markets on the unclear guarantee of growth."

A government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made till we are absolutely confident we have a useful strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to assist them certify their content, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a national data library including public data from a large range of sources will likewise be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the security of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector required to share information of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI companies, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, bphomesteading.com and pattern-wiki.win even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of elements which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training information and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the many downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a portion of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It is complete of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But given how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm uncertain how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.